Predicting lung function decline in cystic fibrosis: the impact of initiating ivacaftor therapy.

BACKGROUND: Modulator therapies that seek to correct the underlying defect in cystic fibrosis (CF) have revolutionized the clinical landscape. Given the heterogeneous nature of lung disease progression in the post-modulator era, there is a need to develop prediction models that are robust to modulator uptake. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal cohort study of the CF Foundation Patient Registry (N = 867 patients carrying the G551D mutation who were treated with ivacaftor from 2003 to 2018). The primary outcome was lung function (percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s or FEV1pp). To characterize the association between ivacaftor initiation and lung function, we developed a dynamic prediction model through covariate selection of demographic and clinical characteristics. The ability of the selected model to predict a decline in lung function, clinically known as an FEV1-indicated exacerbation signal (FIES), was evaluated both at the population level and individual level. RESULTS: Based on the final model, the estimated improvement in FEV1pp after ivacaftor initiation was 4.89% predicted (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.90 to 5.89). The rate of decline was reduced with ivacaftor initiation by 0.14% predicted/year (95% CI: 0.01 to 0.27). More frequent outpatient visits prior to study entry and being male corresponded to a higher overall FEV1pp. Pancreatic insufficiency, older age at study entry, a history of more frequent pulmonary exacerbations, lung infections, CF-related diabetes, and use of Medicaid insurance corresponded to lower FEV1pp. The model had excellent predictive accuracy for FIES events with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.83 to 0.84) for the independent testing cohort and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.89 to 0.90) for 6-month forecasting with the masked cohort. The root-mean-square errors of the FEV1pp predictions for these cohorts were 7.31% and 6.78% predicted, respectively, with standard deviations of 0.29 and 0.20. The predictive accuracy was robust across different covariate specifications. CONCLUSIONS: The methods and applications of dynamic prediction models developed using data prior to modulator uptake have the potential to inform post-modulator projections of lung function and enhance clinical surveillance in the new era of CF care.

In utero and postnatal ivacaftor/lumacaftor therapy rescues multiorgan disease in CFTR-F508del ferrets.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is caused by mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, with F508del being the most prevalent mutation. The combination of CFTR modulators (potentiator and correctors) has provided benefit to CF patients carrying the F508del mutation; however, the safety and effectiveness of in utero combination modulator therapy remains unclear. We created a F508del ferret model to test whether ivacaftor/lumacaftor (VX-770/VX-809) therapy can rescue in utero and postnatal pathologies associated with CF. Using primary intestinal organoids and air-liquid interface cultures of airway epithelia, we demonstrate that the F508del mutation in ferret CFTR results in a severe folding and trafficking defect, which can be partially restored by treatment with CFTR modulators. In utero treatment of pregnant jills with ivacaftor/lumacaftor prevented meconium ileus at birth in F508del kits and sustained postnatal treatment of CF offspring improved survival and partially protected from pancreatic insufficiency. Withdrawal of ivacaftor/lumacaftor treatment from juvenile CF ferrets reestablished pancreatic and lung diseases, with altered pulmonary mechanics. These findings suggest that in utero intervention with a combination of CFTR modulators may provide therapeutic benefits to individuals with F508del. This CFTR-F508del ferret model may be useful for testing therapies using clinically translatable endpoints.

Highly effective cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance (regulator) modulator therapy: shifting the curve for most while leaving some further behind.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Traditional cystic fibrosis (CF) care had been focused on early intervention and symptom mitigation. With the advent of highly effective cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy (HEMT), in particular, the approval of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in 2019, there has been a dramatic improvement in outcomes in CF. The purpose of this article is to review the benefits, limitations, and impact of HEMT as well as discuss the new implications, challenges, and hope that modulators bring to people with CF (pwCF). RECENT FINDINGS: HEMT has demonstrated sustained improvement in lung function, nutrition, quality of life, and survival for over 90% of pwCF. As HEMT has delivered such promise, there is a small but significant portion of pwCF who do not benefit from HEMT due to ineligible mutations, intolerance, or lack of accessibility to modulators. SUMMARY: HEMT has significantly improved outcomes, but continued research is needed to understand the new challenges and implications the era of HEMT will bring, as well as how to provide equitable care to those who are unable to benefit from HEMT.

Lung clearance index (LCI2.5) changes after initiation of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in children with cystic fibrosis aged between 6 and 11 years: The "real-world" differs from trial data.

BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor in combination with Tezacaftor and Ivacaftor (ETI) became licensed in the United Kingdom in early 2022 for children aged 6-11 years with cystic fibrosis (CF) and an eligible mutation. Many in this age group have excellent prior lung health making quantitative measurement of benefit challenging. Clinical trials purport that lung clearance index (LCI2.5) measurement is most suitable for this purpose. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to understand the clinical utility of LCI2.5 in detecting change after commencing ETI in the real world. PATIENT SELECTION/METHODS: Baseline anthropometric data were collected along with spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV1], forced vital capacityFV and LCI2.5 measures in children aged 6-11 years with CF before starting ETI. Measures were repeated after a mean (range) of 8.2 (7-14) months of ETI treatment. The primary endpoint was a change in LCI2.5, with secondary endpoints including change in FEV1 and change in body mass index (BMI) also reported. RESULTS: Twelve children were studied (seven male, mean age 9.5 years at baseline). Our study population had a mean (SD) LCI2.5 of 7.01 (1.14) and FEV1 of 96 (13) %predicted at baseline. Mean (95% confidence interval) changes in LCI2.5 [-0.7 (-1.4, 0), p = .06] and BMI [+0.7 (+0.1, +1.3), p = .03] were observed, along with changes in FEV1 of +3.1 (-1.9, +8.1) %predicted. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world changes in LCI2.5 (-0.7) are different to those reported in clinical trials (-2.29). Lower baseline LCI2.5 as a result of prior modulator exposure, high baseline lung health, and new LCI2.5 software analyses all contribute to lower LCI2.5 values being recorded in the real world of children with CF.

Efficacy of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor on chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis.

PURPOSE: Our work aims to add evidence on the effectiveness of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor on chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study at the Cystic Fibrosis Center of a tertiary care hospital to investigate the effect of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor on chronic rhinosinusitis in cystic fibrosis patients, aged 12 or older. The study's endpoints were the change in the occurrence of acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis, and the variation of the endoscopic and radiologic findings scored using the Lund-Kennedy endoscopic scale, Lund-Mackay, and modified Lund-Mackay radiologic scales, in patients who underwent both pre-treatment and post-treatment examinations. RESULTS: The study population comprised 136 patients, of which 28 underwent both pre-treatment and post-treatment nasal endoscopy and 15 had pre- and post-treatment CT scans. Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor provided a significant improvement in chronic rhinosinusitis. The mean number of acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis per year in the pre-treatment time was 0.55 versus 0.35 during the treatment (p < 0.0021). The Lund-Kennedy scale had a pre-treatment average score of 4.21 points versus 1.5 points after the start of Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor (p < 0.0001). The average Lund-Mackay and modified Lund-Mackay scores in the pre-treatment time were respectively 14.6 and 16.45 points; and after the start of the therapy, they became 5.87 and 6.73 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor was associated with fewer acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis, and a significant improvement of chronic rhinosinusitis evaluated endoscopically and radiologically. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the change in the occurrence of acute exacerbation of chronic rhinosinusitis in patients affected by cystic fibrosis in therapy with Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor.

Effect of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor on mucus and mucociliary clearance in cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: The cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (E/T/I) is highly effective clinically for those with at least one F508del-CFTR allele. The effects of E/T/I on mucociliary clearance (MCC) and sputum properties are unknown. We, therefore, sought to characterize the effects of E/T/I on in vivo MCC and sputum characteristics hypothesized to impact mucus transport. METHODS: Forty-four participants ≥12 years of age were enrolled into this prospective, observational trial prior to initiation of E/T/I and had baseline measurement of MCC and characterization of induced sputum and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) samples. Study procedures were repeated after 1 month of E/T/I treatment. RESULTS: Average age was 27.7 years with baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of 78.2 % predicted. 52 % of subjects had previously been treated with a 2-drug CFTR modulator combination. The average whole lung MCC rate measured over 60 min (WLAveClr60) significantly improved from baseline to post-E/T/I (14.8 vs. 22.8 %; p = 0.0002), as did other MCC indices. Sputum% solids also improved (modeled mean 3.4 vs. 2.2 %; p<0.0001), whereas non-significant reductions in sputum macrorheology (G', G") were observed. No meaningful changes in exhaled breath condensate endpoints (sialic acid:urea ratio, pH) were observed. CONCLUSIONS: E/T/I improved the hydration of respiratory secretions (% solids) and markedly accelerated MCC. These data confirm the link between CFTR function, mucus solid content, and MCC and help to define the utility of MCC and mucus-related bioassays in future efforts to restore CFTR function in all people with CF.

Understanding and addressing the needs of people with cystic fibrosis in the era of CFTR modulator therapy.

Cystic fibrosis is a multiorgan disease caused by impaired function of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR). Since the introduction of the CFTR modulator combination elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI), which acts directly on mutant CFTR to enhance its activity, most people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) have seen pronounced reductions in symptoms, and studies project marked increases in life expectancy for pwCF who are eligible for ETI. However, modulator therapy has not cured cystic fibrosis and the success of CFTR modulators has resulted in immediate questions about the new state of cystic fibrosis disease and clinical challenges in the care of pwCF. In this Series paper, we summarise key questions about cystic fibrosis disease in the era of modulator therapy, highlighting state-of-the-art research and clinical practices, knowledge gaps, new challenges faced by pwCF and the potential for future health-care challenges, and the pressing need for additional therapies to treat the underlying genetic or molecular causes of cystic fibrosis.

Improvement in Lung Clearance Index and Chest Computed Tomography Scores with Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor Treatment in People with Cystic Fibrosis Aged 12 Years and Older - The RECOVER Trial.

Rationale: Clinical trials have shown that use of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI) is associated with improvements in sweat chloride, pulmonary function, nutrition, and quality of life in people with cystic fibrosis (CF). Little is known about the impact of ETI on ventilation inhomogeneity and lung structure. Objectives: RECOVER is a real-world study designed to measure the impact of ETI in people with CF. The primary endpoints were lung clearance (lung clearance index; LCI2.5) and FEV1. Secondary endpoints included spirometry-controlled chest computed tomography (CT) scores. Methods: The study was conducted in seven sites in Ireland and the United Kingdom. Participants ages 12 years and older who were homozygous for the F508del mutation (F508del/F508del) or heterozygous for F508del and a minimum-function mutation (F508del/MF) were recruited before starting ETI and were followed up over 12 months. LCI2.5 was measured using nitrogen multiple breath washout (MBW) at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Spirometry was performed as per the criteria of the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society. Spirometry-controlled chest CT scans were performed at baseline and at 12 months. CT scans were scored using the Perth Rotterdam Annotated Grid Morphometric Analysis (PRAGMA) system. Other outcome measures include weight, height, Cystic Fibrosis Quality of Life Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R), and sweat chloride. Measurements and Main Results: One hundred seventeen people with CF ages 12 and older were recruited to the study. Significant improvements were seen in LCI scores (-2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.0, -2.0) and in the percents predicted for FEV1 (8.9; 95% CI, 7.0, 10.9), FVC (6.6; 95% CI, 4.9, 8.3), and forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% of expired volume (12.4; 95% CI, 7.8, 17.0). Overall PRAGMA-CF scores reflecting airway disease improved significantly (-3.46; 95% CI, -5.23, -1.69). Scores for trapped air, mucus plugging, and bronchial wall thickening improved significantly, but bronchiectasis scores did not. Sweat chloride levels decreased in both F508del/F508del (-43.1; 95% CI, -47.4, -38.9) and F508del/MF (-42.8; 95% CI, -48.5, -37.2) groups. Scores on the Respiratory Domain of the CFQ-R improved by 14.2 points (95% CI, 11.3, 17.2). At 1 year, sweat chloride levels were significantly lower for the F508del/F508del group compared with scores for the F508del/MF group (33.93 vs. 53.36, P < 0.001). Conclusions: ETI is associated with substantial improvements in LCI2.5, spirometry, and PRAGMA-CF CT scores in people with CF ages 12 years and older. ETI led to improved nutrition and quality of life. People in the F508del/F508del group had significantly lower sweat chloride on ETI treatment compared with the F508del/MF group. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04602468).

Impact of lumacaftor/ivacaftor and tezacaftor/ivacaftor on treatment response in pulmonary exacerbations of F508del/F508del cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary exacerbations (PEx) remain a major cause of morbidity and mortality in people with cystic fibrosis (PWCF). Although the combination cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators lumacaftor/ivacaftor and tezacaftor/ivacaftor have been shown to reduce PEx frequency, their influence on clinical and biochemical responses to acute PEx treatment is unknown. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of STOP2, a large multicenter randomized controlled trial of antimicrobial treatment durations for adult PWCF presenting with PEx. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcomes in antibiotic-treated F508del/F508del PWCF receiving lumacaftor/ivacaftor or tezacaftor/ivacaftor with those observed in antibiotic-treated F508del/F508del controls not receiving CFTR modulator therapy. The primary outcome measure was the change in percent predicted FEV1 (ppFEV1) following completion of intravenous (IV) antibiotics, with post-antibiotic changes in symptoms, serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations and weight included as secondary endpoints. RESULTS: Among 982 PEx events in randomized PWCF, 480 were homozygous for F508del, of whom 289 were receiving lumacaftor/ivacaftor or tezacaftor/ivacaftor at initiation of antibiotic therapy. Modulator-treated F508del/F508del PWCF did not demonstrate greater improvements in ppFEV1, symptoms, serum CRP or weight following antibiotic treatment compared to modulator-naïve controls matched for age, sex, baseline ppFEV1, genotype, body mass index, initial CRP, initial symptoms, exacerbation history, diabetic status, randomization arm and concomitant medical therapy. CONCLUSION: In the acute setting, CFTR modulator therapy with lumacaftor/ivacaftor or tezacaftor/ivacaftor does not convey additional clinical or biochemical advantage above standardized PEx treatment in F508del/F508del PWCF.

Unplanned pregnancies following the introduction of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor therapy in women with cystic fibrosis.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) causes infertility and subfertility due to various factors, including altered cervical mucus, delayed puberty, and hormonal imbalances. With the introduction of the CFTR modulator therapy elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor, we have observed an increase in unplanned pregnancies among women undergoing ETI treatment in our CF center, despite repeated recommendations for strict fertility monitoring. It appears that these pregnancies are more likely attributed to reduced attention to the possibility of conception rather than contraceptive failure. The perception of subfertility developed by women with CF over time, before the era of modulators, can influence their long-term habits and lead to the underuse of contraceptive methods. While further research is needed to fully understand the effects of ETI on fertility, healthcare providers should be attentive to the fertility concerns of women with CF, particularly those treated with modulators in adulthood.

Drug-drug interactions involving CFTR modulators: a review of the evidence and clinical implications.

INTRODUCTION: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is characterized by mucus accumulation impairing the lungs, gastrointestinal tract, and other organs. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators (ivacaftor, tezacaftor, elexacaftor, and lumacaftor) significantly improve lung function and nutritional status; however, they are substrates, inhibitors, and/or inducers of certain CYP enzymes and transporters, raising the risk of drug-drug interactions (DDI) with common CF medications. AREAS COVERED: A literature search was conducted for DDIs involving CFTR modulators by reviewing new drug applications, drug package inserts, clinical studies, and validated databases of substrates, inhibitors, and inducers. Clinically, CYP3A inducers and inhibitors significantly decrease and increase systemic concentrations of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, respectively. Additionally, lumacaftor and ivacaftor alter concentrations of CYP3A and P-gp substrates. Potential DDIs without current clinical evidence include ivacaftor and elexacaftor's effect on CYP2C9 and OATP1B1/3 substrates, respectively, and OATP1B1/3 and P-gp inhibitors' effect on tezacaftor. A literature review was conducted using PubMed. EXPERT OPINION: Dosing recommendations for CFTR modulators with DDIs are relatively comprehensive; however, recommendations on timing of dosing transition of CFTR modulators when CYP3A inhibitors are initiated or discontinued is incomplete. Certain drug interactions may be managed by choosing an alternative treatment to avoid/minimize DDIs. Next generation CFTR modulator therapies under development are expected to provide increased activity with reduced DDI risk.

Clinical and functional efficacy of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis carrying the N1303K mutation.

BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) significantly improves health outcomes in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) carrying one or two F508del mutations. According to in vitro assays performed in FRT cells, 178 additional mutations respond to ELX/TEZ/IVA. The N1303K mutation is not included in this list of mutations. Recent in vitro data suggested that ELX/TEZ/IVA increases N1303K-CFTR activity. Based on the in vitro response, eight patients commenced treatment with ELX/TEZ/IVA. METHODS: Two homozygotes; and six compound heterozygotes N1303K/nonsense or frameshift mutation pwCF were treated off label with ELX/TEZ/IVA. Clinical data before and 8 weeks after starting treatment were prospectively collected. The response to ELX/TEZ/IVA was assessed in intestinal organoids derived from 5 study patients and an additional patient carrying N1303K that is not receiving treatment. RESULTS: Compared to the values before commencing treatment, mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second increased by 18.4 percentage points and 26.5% relative to baseline, mean BMI increased by 0.79 Kg/m2, and mean lung clearance index decreased by 3.6 points and 22.2%. There was no significant change in sweat chloride. Nasal potential difference normalized in four patients and remained abnormal in three. Results in 3D intestinal organoids and 2D nasal epithelial cultures showed a response in CFTR channel activity. CONCLUSIONS: This report supports the previously reported in vitro data, performed in human nasal and bronchial epithelial cells and intestinal organoids, that pwCF who carry the N1303K mutation have a significant clinical benefit by ELX/TEZ/IVA treatment.

Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Children Aged ⩾6 Years with Cystic Fibrosis and at Least One F508del Allele: A Phase 3, Open-Label Clinical Trial.

Rationale: A 24-week, phase 3, open-label study showed elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) was safe and efficacious in children aged 6-11 years with cystic fibrosis (CF) and one or more F508del-CFTR alleles. Objectives: To assess long-term safety and efficacy of ELX/TEZ/IVA in children who completed the pivotal 24-week phase 3 trial. Methods: In this phase 3, two-part (part A and part B), open-label extension study, children aged ⩾6 years with CF heterozygous for F508del and a minimal function CFTR mutation (F/MF genotypes) or homozygous for F508del (F/F genotype) who completed the 24-week parent study received ELX/TEZ/IVA based on weight. Children weighing <30 kg received ELX 100 mg once daily/TEZ 50 mg once daily/IVA 75 mg every 12 hours, whereas children weighing ⩾30 kg received ELX 200 mg once daily/TEZ 100 mg once daily/IVA 150 mg every 12 hours (adult dose). The 96-week analysis of part A of this extension study is reported here. Measurements and Main Results: Sixty-four children (F/MF genotypes, n = 36; F/F genotype, n = 28) were enrolled and received one or more doses of ELX/TEZ/IVA. Mean (SD) period of exposure to ELX/TEZ/IVA was 93.9 (11.1) weeks. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability. Adverse events and serious adverse events were consistent with common manifestations of CF disease. Overall, exposure-adjusted rates of adverse events and serious adverse events (407.74 and 4.72 events per 100 patient-years) were lower than in the parent study (987.04 and 8.68 events per 100 patient-years). One child (1.6%) had an adverse event of aggression that was moderate in severity and resolved after study drug discontinuation. From parent study baseline at Week 96 of this extension study, the mean percent predicted FEV1 increased (11.2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 8.3 to 14.2] percentage points), sweat chloride concentration decreased (-62.3 [95% CI, -65.9 to -58.8] mmol/L), Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised respiratory domain score increased (13.3 [95% CI, 11.4 to 15.1] points), and lung clearance index 2.5 decreased (-2.00 [95% CI, -2.45 to -1.55] units). Increases in growth parameters were also observed. The estimated pulmonary exacerbation rate per 48 weeks was 0.04. The annualized rate of change in percent predicted FEV1 was 0.51 (95% CI, -0.73 to 1.75) percentage points per year. Conclusions: ELX/TEZ/IVA continued to be generally safe and well tolerated in children aged ⩾6 years through an additional 96 weeks of treatment. Improvements in lung function, respiratory symptoms, and CFTR function observed in the parent study were maintained. These results demonstrate the favorable long-term safety profile and durable clinical benefits of ELX/TEZ/IVA in this pediatric population. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04183790).

Radiological and long-term clinical response to elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor in people with cystic fibrosis with advanced lung disease.

INTRODUCTION: A triple combination of CFTR modulators ELE/TEZ/IVA (elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor, Trikafta™) has been evaluated in clinical trials for people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) and was approved to the European and US market. During registration and settling reimbursement in Europe, it could be requested on a compassionate use basis, for patients with advanced lung disease (ppFEV1 < 40). AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate 2 years of experience with the clinical and radiological response of ELE/TEZ/IVA in pwCF in a compassionate use setting. METHODS: pwCF who started ELE/TEZ/IVA in a compassionate use setting were prospectively followed with assessment of spirometry, BMI, chest CT, CFQ-R and sweat chloride concentration (SCC) before start and after 3 months. Furthermore, spirometry, sputum cultures, and BMI were repeated after 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were eligible for this evaluation, nine with F508del/F508del genotype (eight of whom were using dual CFTR modulators) and nine with F508del/minimal function mutation. After 3 months, mean change in SCC was -44.9 (p ≤ 0.001), together with significant improvement in CT (change in Brody score: -28.27 p ≤ 0.001) and CFQ-R results (change in respiratory domain: +18.8, p = 0.002). After 24 months, ppFEV1 change was +8.89 (p = 0.002), BMI had improved by +1.53 kg/m2 (p ≤ 0.001) and exacerbation rate declined from 5.94 in 24 months before start to 1.17 (p ≤ 0.001) in the 24 months after. CONCLUSION: pwCF with advanced lung disease experience relevant clinical benefit after 2 years of treatment with ELE/TEZ/IVA in a compassionate use setting. Structural lung damage, quality of life, exacerbation rate, and BMI improved significantly with treatment. Gain in ppFEV1 is lower compared to the phase III trials that included younger patients with moderately affected lung function.

Human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) plasma concentration inversely correlates with the improvement of cystic fibrosis lung disease in p.Phe508del-CFTR homozygous cases treated with the CFTR modulator lumacaftor/ivacaftor combination.

BACKGROUND: We previously documented that elevated HE4 plasma concentration decreased in people with CF (pwCF) bearing the p.Gly551Asp-CFTR variant in response to CFTR modulator (CFTRm) ivacaftor (IVA), and this level was inversely correlated with the FEV1% predicted values (ppFEV1). Although the effectiveness of lumacaftor (LUM)/IVA in pwCF homozygous for the p.Phe508del-CFTR variant has been evaluated, plasma biomarkers were not used to monitor treatment efficacy thus far. METHODS: Plasma HE4 concentration was examined in 68 pwCF drawn from the PROSPECT study who were homozygous for the p.Phe508del-CFTR variant before treatment and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after administration of LUM/IVA therapy. Plasma HE4 was correlated with ppFEV1 using their absolute and delta values. The discriminatory power of delta HE4 was evaluated for the detection of lung function improvements based on ROC-AUC analysis and multiple regression test. RESULTS: HE4 plasma concentration was significantly reduced below baseline following LUM/IVA administration during the entire study period. The mean change of ppFEV1 was 2.6% (95% CI, 0.6 to 4.5) by 6 months of therapy in this sub-cohort. A significant inverse correlation between delta values of HE4 and ppFEV1 was observed especially in children with CF (r=-0.7053; p<0.0001). Delta HE4 predicted a 2.6% mean change in ppFEV1 (AUC: 0.7898 [95% CI 0.6823-0.8972]; P < 0.0001) at a cut-off value of -10.7 pmol/L. Moreover, delta HE4 independently represented the likelihood of being a responder with ≥ 5% delta ppFEV1 at 6 months (OR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.82-0.95; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma HE4 level negatively correlates with lung function improvement assessed by ppFEV1 in pwCF undergoing LUM/IVA CFTRm treatment.

Phase 3 Open-Label Clinical Trial of Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor in Children Aged 2-5 Years with Cystic Fibrosis and at Least One F508del Allele.

Rationale: Elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) has been shown to be safe and effective in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) aged ⩾6 years with at least one F508del-CFTR allele but has not been studied in younger children. Objectives: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and efficacy of ELX/TEZ/IVA in children with CF aged 2-5 years. Methods: In this phase 3, open-label, two-part study (parts A and B), children weighing <14 kg (on Day 1) received ELX 80 mg once daily (qd), TEZ 40 mg qd, and IVA 60 mg each morning and 59.5 mg each evening; children weighing ⩾14 kg received ELX 100 mg qd, TEZ 50 mg qd, and IVA 75 mg every 12 hours. Measurements and Main Results: The primary endpoints for part A (15-d treatment period) were pharmacokinetics and safety and tolerability. For part B (24-wk treatment period), the primary endpoint was safety and tolerability; secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics and absolute changes from baseline in sweat chloride concentration and lung clearance index2.5 (LCI2.5, defined as the number of lung turnovers required to reduce the end tidal N2 concentration to 2.5% of its starting value) through Week 24. Analysis of pharmacokinetic data from 18 children enrolled in part A confirmed the appropriateness of the part B dosing regimen. In part B, 75 children (F508del/minimal function genotypes, n = 52; F508del/F508del genotype, n = 23) were enrolled and dosed. Seventy-four children (98.7%) had adverse events, which were all mild (62.7%) or moderate (36.0%) in severity. The most common adverse events were cough, fever, and rhinorrhea. Decreases in sweat chloride concentration (-57.9 mmol/L; 95% confidence interval [CI], -61.3 to -54.6; n = 69) and LCI2.5 (-0.83 U; 95% CI, -1.01 to -0.66; n = 50) were observed from baseline through Week 24. Mean body mass index was within the normal range at baseline and remained stable at Week 24. Conclusions: In this open-label study in children 2-5 years of age, ELX/TEZ/IVA treatment was generally safe and well tolerated, with a safety profile consistent with that observed in older age groups, and led to clinically meaningful reductions in sweat chloride concentration and LCI2.5. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04537793).

Safety and efficacy of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor in adults with cystic fibrosis: randomised, double-blind, controlled, phase 2 trials.

BACKGROUND: Elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor has been shown to be safe and efficacious in people with cystic fibrosis and at least one F508del allele. Our aim was to identify a novel cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator combination capable of further increasing CFTR-mediated chloride transport, with the potential for once-daily dosing. METHODS: We conducted two phase 2 clinical trials to assess the safety and efficacy of a once-daily combination of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor in participants with cystic fibrosis who were aged 18 years or older. A phase 2 randomised, double-blind, active-controlled study (VX18-561-101; April 17, 2019, to Aug 20, 2020) was carried out to compare deutivacaftor monotherapy with ivacaftor monotherapy in participants with CFTR gating mutations, following a 4-week ivacaftor monotherapy run-in period. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either ivacaftor 150 mg every 12 h, deutivacaftor 25 mg once daily, deutivacaftor 50 mg once daily, deutivacaftor 150 mg once daily, or deutivacaftor 250 mg once daily in a 1:1:2:2:2 ratio. The primary endpoint was absolute change in ppFEV1 from baseline at week 12. A phase 2 randomised, double-blind, controlled, proof-of-concept study of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (VX18-121-101; April 30, 2019, to Dec 10, 2019) was conducted in participants with cystic fibrosis and heterozygous for F508del and a minimal function mutation (F/MF genotypes) or homozygous for F508del (F/F genotype). Participants with F/MF genotypes were randomly assigned 1:2:2:1 to receive either 5 mg, 10 mg, or 20 mg of vanzacaftor in combination with tezacaftor-deutivacaftor or a triple placebo for 4 weeks, and participants with the F/F genotype were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either vanzacaftor (20 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor or tezacaftor-ivacaftor active control for 4 weeks, following a 4-week tezacaftor-ivacaftor run-in period. Primary endpoints for part 1 and part 2 were safety and tolerability and absolute change in ppFEV1 from baseline to day 29. Secondary efficacy endpoints were absolute change from baseline at day 29 in sweat chloride concentrations and Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R) respiratory domain score. These clinical trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03911713 and NCT03912233, and are complete. FINDINGS: In study VX18-561-101, participants treated with deutivacaftor 150 mg once daily (n=23) or deutivacaftor 250 mg once daily (n=24) had mean absolute changes in ppFEV1 of 3·1 percentage points (95% CI -0·8 to 7·0) and 2·7 percentage points (-1·0 to 6·5) from baseline at week 12, respectively, versus -0·8 percentage points (-6·2 to 4·7) with ivacaftor 150 mg every 12 h (n=11); the deutivacaftor safety profile was consistent with the established safety profile of ivacaftor 150 mg every 12 h. In study VX18-121-101, participants with F/MF genotypes treated with vanzacaftor (5 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=9), vanzacaftor (10 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=19), vanzacaftor (20 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=20), and placebo (n=10) had mean changes relative to baseline at day 29 in ppFEV1 of 4·6 percentage points (-1·3 to 10·6), 14·2 percentage points (10·0 to 18·4), 9·8 percentage points (5·7 to 13·8), and 1·9 percentage points (-4·1 to 8·0), respectively, in sweat chloride concentration of -42·8 mmol/L (-51·7 to -34·0), -45·8 mmol/L (95% CI -51·9 to -39·7), -49·5 mmol/L (-55·9 to -43·1), and 2·3 mmol/L (-7·0 to 11·6), respectively, and in CFQ-R respiratory domain score of 17·6 points (3·5 to 31·6), 21·2 points (11·9 to 30·6), 29·8 points (21·0 to 38·7), and 3·3 points (-10·1 to 16·6), respectively. Participants with the F/F genotype treated with vanzacaftor (20 mg)-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor (n=18) and tezacaftor-ivacaftor (n=10) had mean changes relative to baseline (taking tezacaftor-ivacaftor) at day 29 in ppFEV1 of 15·9 percentage points (11·3 to 20·6) and -0·1 percentage points (-6·4 to 6·1), respectively, in sweat chloride concentration of -45·5 mmol/L (-49·7 to -41·3) and -2·6 mmol/L (-8·2 to 3·1), respectively, and in CFQ-R respiratory domain score of 19·4 points (95% CI 10·5 to 28·3) and -5·0 points (-16·9 to 7·0), respectively. The most common adverse events overall were cough, increased sputum, and headache. One participant in the vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor group had a serious adverse event of infective pulmonary exacerbation and another participant had a serious rash event that led to treatment discontinuation. For most participants, adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. INTERPRETATION: Once-daily dosing with vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor was safe and well tolerated and improved lung function, respiratory symptoms, and CFTR function. These results support the continued investigation of vanzacaftor-tezacaftor-deutivacaftor in phase 3 clinical trials compared with elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor. FUNDING: Vertex Pharmaceuticals.